What creationists have to get their heads round is that evolution canot be disproved biblically. The science of evolution will continue to be pulled apart and rebuilt by scientists as new science is discovered. For creationists all they have is the 'good book' which scientifically does not hold water.
The Bible has only been around for a couple of thousand years while scientists can rely on nature and the millions of years of fossil evidence to refer to in their research.
Paul, when engaging in debate with creationists I advise that you take their comments with a very strong pinch of salt, which I am sure you do.
That was a very good post.
Comment from: Joseph Visitor
Actully yes I can disprove evolution! If you go back to the very first cell. The prokaryote cell. Evolution cant prove were that cell came from. If you say a more simple cell made that one. Then.. what made that cell,and what made the cell that made that cell. Eaither there was in infinite amount cells. Or that cell came out of no where. So... evolution cant of happend. Unless some type of inteligent creator made that very first cell.
Comment from: Member
A cell is not the simplest form of life. Actually a single celled organism is already pretty complicated.
The building blocks of life form naturally, in well known processes, they eventually formed a molecule that could make crude copies of itself, thereby giving evolution something to work on.
Comment from: Kaan Visitor
"This mutation was beneficial because it better protected the body from ultra-violent radiation (previously our hair protected us against it), and alas it spread throughout the population."
Unfortunate use of the word alas here. Meriam Webster defines alas as an interjection "used to express unhappiness, pity, or concern." I doubt you think that humans developing dark skin is something to be woeful about, perhaps you can change your wording?
Otherwise, I just found your website, and so far I've enjoyed reading your stuff.