It's very rare I read an article in the mainstream press which makes so much sense, and tackles a scientific topic so well.
Simon Singh +1 point(s), but as he's the co-author of 'Trick or Treatment? Alternative Medicine on Trial' maybe he should get an additional point.
Ever since receiving my first ever acupuncture session last month, I have been repeatedly asked whether or not it was effective.
[W]hy on earth should my personal experience be important, when we have evidence from tens of thousands of patients who have received acupuncture during carefully observed scientific trials?
Excellent, now if only all journalists could learn this skill when dealing with a scientific topic, especially when it concerns something health related. We use science to decide if something works or not, because its the most reliable method we have.
He then goes on to talk about the scientific evidence and how there is no evidence to suggest acupuncture is effective.
Good stuff. I'm fed up with the free-ride
alternative crap-based medicine is getting in the press, and I'm furious with how much public money is wasted on junk like homeopathy and the rest. The proponents of this sort of stuff aren't just taking people's money like most pseudo-scientific nonsense, they're screwing with people's health too.