Office Open XML "protests"

Although I was meaning to post something back when the Office Open XML format was approved by the ISO despite lobbying by the likes of Sun and IBM, I never got around to it but it looks like the issue is back in the news.

I was some what amused to read that the Linux/Open Source aka anti-Microsoft crowd have been protesting, yes actually protesting outside the ISO committee meeting in Norway recently. This goes on top of a large amount of activity over the last few months, even to the point of these protesters tracking down which hotels people have been staying at for meetings.

Mitchell claims that opponents of OOXML have resorted to intimidation. "People have been trying to track down what hotels people have been staying at for the BRMs [Ballot Resolution Meetings]. Many voting decisions are not taken until the day. If you've had no sleep on the night before a vote [because of noisy protests], you might change your voting behaviour," he said.

Mitchell also attacked the 'no' voters who can't justify their actions. "If people vote no or yes you would really like to know why. I have spoken to some people who've voted no and asked them why and they said 'because we don't like it'. If people are representing their country they should be able to more clearly defend what their national technological position is."

The committee even released an open letter calling for an end to "personal attacks".

Of course this doesn't come as any surprise to me, these lunatics have been around for years, I say lunatics because they are almost entirely anti-Microsoft, they read and believe far too much Slashdot for their own good. A decade ago they were protesting because Microsoft wouldn't support international standards. Now that Microsoft do support, and submit specifications to international standards bodies, they still get attacked.

Seriously guys. I'm not one to attack people who are protesting, but this is a bloody document format for heaven's sake!

3 comments

Comment from: Mark Sowul [Visitor] · http://marksowul.com
***--
I don't know, although I think most of them are off their rockers (I mean, for goodness sakes its a document format-- get a grip) but I still think it's fishy to green-light and fast-track a standard that can't really be implemented by others because of such silliness as "KeepParagraphsLikeWord95" or whatever.

One thing I do agree with is that more than one party should be able to independently implement a standard before it is ratified. Cf. HTML, which is so complex and ambiguous that it still has not really been implemented 100% correctly by anyone.
16th April 2008 @ 22:41
Comment from: Paul Smith [Member] · http://www.dasmirnov.net/
There's certainly a number of technical issues with the specification, a lot of which were worked out over the last six months or so - but none the less the specifications are complicated and Ecma choosing to fast-track it may of been the wrong choice.

The trouble is the technical issues get mixed with the anti-Microsoft, IBM and Sun lobbying nonsense, which should be entirely seperate.
17th April 2008 @ 16:22
Comment from: Mark Sowul [Visitor] · http://marksowul.com
"The trouble is the technical issues get mixed with the anti-Microsoft, IBM and Sun lobbying nonsense, which should be entirely seperate."

Agreed, but I think we can both agree that it will never happen. Even if the standard were perfect it would get attacked. This creates a sort-of "boy who cried wolf effect," I think.
20th April 2008 @ 02:01

Leave a comment


Your email address will not be revealed on this site.

Your URL will be displayed.
PoorExcellent
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Name, email & website)