Why socialism?

From an essay written by Albert Einstein in 1949:

Production is carried on for profit, not for use. There is no provision that all those able and willing to work will always be in a position to find employment; an “army of unemployed” almost always exists. The worker is constantly in fear of losing his job. Since unemployed and poorly paid workers do not provide a profitable market, the production of consumers' goods is restricted, and great hardship is the consequence. Technological progress frequently results in more unemployment rather than in an easing of the burden of work for all. The profit motive, in conjunction with competition among capitalists, is responsible for an instability in the accumulation and utilization of capital which leads to increasingly severe depressions. Unlimited competition leads to a huge waste of labor, and to that crippling of the social consciousness of individuals which I mentioned before.

This crippling of individuals I consider the worst evil of capitalism. Our whole educational system suffers from this evil. An exaggerated competitive attitude is inculcated into the student, who is trained to worship acquisitive success as a preparation for his future career.

I am convinced there is only one way to eliminate these grave evils, namely through the establishment of a socialist economy, accompanied by an educational system which would be oriented toward social goals. In such an economy, the means of production are owned by society itself and are utilized in a planned fashion. A planned economy, which adjusts production to the needs of the community, would distribute the work to be done among all those able to work and would guarantee a livelihood to every man, woman, and child. The education of the individual, in addition to promoting his own innate abilities, would attempt to develop in him a sense of responsibility for his fellow men in place of the glorification of power and success in our present society.

Read the complete essay online here.

1 comment

To make this article more interesting, please allow me to make a slight disagreement on this.

I'm a follower of my professor back in the university a decade ago :)

In democracy context..

For me, unemployment, which are happening after technological increase, is actually the result of inability to convey the necessary knowledge level of the new technology to the working class.

Those who are lucky to get and receive the necesssary knowledge level, most likely will not be unemployed and still be able to work.

This statement should stay true, even if the economy should get stagnant or even shrink. If economy don't grow, then those lucky people will still be working in "over working specification" condition.. A master in chemical engineering, may have to work as a lab tester.. This does happen on some countries..

But I like with your socialism idea, even though I still think the application for education distribution will depend more on the people's morality who operate the system.

Thank you.

J.C. Carvill
Email: support@cosmosing.com
URL: http://www.cosmosing.com/jeanclaudecarvill/index.php
15th November 2007 @ 08:44

Leave a comment


Your email address will not be revealed on this site.

Your URL will be displayed.
PoorExcellent
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Name, email & website)