Hilarious atheist nightmare videos debunked

I know I've posted the banana one up on Portal Forums, but I'd thought I'd cover it again here, as well as a new video. Simply because they're so dumb, you couldn't be any dumber if you tried. This is, frankly, in my opinion the finest work "creation science" has ever done, they moved into "creation comedy" so seamlessly. It is disappointing that some people have taken these seriously and have used them to re-enforce their beliefs, I look forward to a world where people, all people, will be educated and intelligent enough to laugh at how ridiculous these guys are.

The Atheist's Nightmare: The Banana.

There's one small problem with this argument. It assumes that god created the banana in its present form. Guess what? He didn't. We created the banana over the last ten thousand years. God's wild banana looks something like this:

Musa maclayi (banana)

In fact this proves evolution. We changed that thing into the bananas we eat today. Like almost everything else connected with agriculture, we produced the species we have today, crops of all kinds, cows, pigs, you name it we've changed it. We selected which varieties could reproduce and which could not.

The banana and all domesticated species are proof that evolution works.

The Atheist's Nightmare: Peanut Butter.

There's one small problem with this argument too. It assumes the early Earth was a giant peanut butter jar. The early Earth was rich in hydrogen based gases, methane, ammonia, water vapour etc. A peanut butter jar is not the right conditions.

It also confuses evolution with spontaneous generation, nobody is saying you'll magically get something like an insect in there, it took the Earth four billion years to do that. Evolution explains why we have so many different species in the world, and how we get new species, evolution assumes you already have life. It doesn't deal with how life started, that's where abiogenesis comes in, and you don't start out with anything remotely resembling a modern single celled life form, something that took four billion years to evolve.

You start off with methane, hydrogen, ammonia, water vapour etc, a few sparks of lightning and you'll get amino acids, they self-assemble we've watched it happen in only a few hours. Amino acids go on to build proteins, nucleic acids form which can make copies of themselves and so on. Sure there is much more research to do, but all the bits are there and the number of gaps god has to hide in is progressively shrinking.

It shows the intellectual dishonesty of the creationists, they've made these points for decades and no matter how much evidence, no matter how many times they're told that evolution doesn't deal with the origin of life, or how many times they're told that a banana is a domesticated plant they just carry on parroting the same utterly nonsensical arguments because they need to keep the faithful inline.

"Evolution is a fact not a theory, it really happened" - Carl Sagan.

11 comments

Comment from: julian [Visitor]
AAAAHHHHH!!1 RUN THEY HAVE PEANUT BUTTER!
10th April 2007 @ 03:09
Comment from: Mark Rostron [Visitor]
Some people are just soooo dumb.

Another point, although there have been 1 billion experiments per year for the last 100 years, one must ask how many people actually noticed a patch of 10 bacteria, let alone a single spontaneously created life form in their peanut butter.

Life was created in a laboratory the size of the universe which has run the 'experiment' for billions of years. It's going to take a very long time for it to actually create it in a jar of peanut butter.

Actually, you could argue that the fact we have never seen new life created in a jar of peanut butter is a compelling argument for the fact god is dead as he/she/it/them is no longer creating new lifeforms. This argument is just as valid as the anti-evolution theory.
12th April 2007 @ 04:59
Comment from: Nick [Visitor] · http://webnv.net
I've heard of the banana excuse many times. It's just absurd to think that creationism is right because of this banana. If god really created that banana, then why not make all the other fruits and vegetables like that? Why just the banana?

They really are grabbing at straws here. These are desperate attempts to help back their belief.
13th April 2007 @ 21:54
Comment from: Greg Gibbs [Visitor] · http://www.atheistsnightmare.com/
Here's my satire of the Atheist Nightmare videos.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2fG4Z9AXI9M&feature=PlayList&p=0CD32336D44C5188&index=1
21st June 2007 @ 12:22
Comment from: Sarl Cagan [Visitor]
Plus your hand, curled, has seven grooves for those five ridges. Apparently creationists can't even count on their own hands.
28th August 2007 @ 11:13
Comment from: Cody [Visitor]
The only problem I have is I don't think we have enough evidence to prove either right or wrong. The problem is both trying to prove there fact. Devine creation is all faith you can't argue against faith because its what someone believes. With evolution the problem is we weren't there when it happened and no matter how much we try to recreate it we cant prove the accuracy. I say leave it alone and quit bickering.
16th November 2007 @ 18:27
Comment from: Paul Smith [Member] · http://www.dasmirnov.net/
Just becaues somebody has "faith" doesn't mean they are not wrong. Creation makes claims which effect the natural world, and therefore it is entirely proper to seek to understand it.

We have mountains of evidence on one side and zero on the other.
16th November 2007 @ 19:03
Comment from: elizabeth [Visitor]
What evidence?
27th February 2008 @ 22:37
Comment from: Paul Smith [Member] · http://www.dasmirnov.net/
All of biology over the last century and a half?
27th February 2008 @ 22:44
Comment from: Mike [Visitor]
Albeit yes this was a very poor attempt at his point on the surface. However, If you look deeper into that point and not just on the surface one could say that God gave us the ability to make the banana as we eat it today. Or, that God forced us to create something that wasn't there. Which in turn causes us to have these types of discussions, which in turn cause us to take one side or the other, and further separate ourselves from the truth and or come closer to it. Orrrrrr, maybe this is just mans attempt on either side to make an arguement about their belifes which could be horribly inaccurate? I dunno, I'm just a guy at a computer reading ppls ideas about what what they think a banana means about life! Oh and I'ma Christian too LOL!!!! Toooo funny!!!
9th March 2008 @ 05:35
Comment from: christopher allman [Visitor]
Even if new life did arise in the peanut butter it would then be in conflict with the microbial life that the peanut butter is already teeming with.
Supposing it still survived until we opened it, It is highly unlikely we would notice it with the naked eye.
27th May 2008 @ 05:39

Leave a comment


Your email address will not be revealed on this site.

Your URL will be displayed.
PoorExcellent
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Name, email & website)