Creationists and more words

The Daily Creationism guy:

If evolution and the big bang is true then that meant that all of the matter in the universe was squished in to a dot no bigger than the period at the end of this sentence.

That is one crowded dot!

Then boys and girls the dot span faster and faster and faster and faster until bang the dot exploded and formed the whole universe.

Billions of years ago there was a big bang in space. No body knows what caused the big bang it just happened.

Oh jeez. The Big Bang wasn't a Big Bang in space. Space-time didn't exist, the Big Bang was the expansion of space-time. Also the matter wasn't contained with the "dot" it's my understanding that some energy was converted into matter with the expansion.

The size of the "dot" is meaningless, how can you measure it? Spin of the dot? How can you measure that? It certainly didn't spin so much to "blow up" as you claim. There's a lot of difference between a dot and a singularity that is everything.

The Theory of Evolution and Big Bang Theory are two separate things, one deals with the origin of species, one deals with the origin of the universe.

Evolution itself has been proven as near to absolutely as you can get. In a 150 years or so years zero contradictionary evidence has been found, the only thing being found are mountains of evidence that support it every year.

Big Bang Theory has many issues that need to be resolved, and there are many scientists actively working on it, and those issues shall be resolved and the theory adjusted or a new one built to fit with the data.

If you really want to make a mess in the scientific world, picking on evolution is just folly, pick on the theories that have contradictionary evidence, or hell why don't you find some evidence yourself and put forward your own hypothesis.

18 comments

Comment from: Big Bang Is A Myth [Visitor] · http://www.thedailycreationism.blogspot.com/
You say that eviolution has been proved but you haven't given me any prof at all.

I can't read through that whole website.

I have a colage course to do.

If you think that there is evidence at all then could you please tell me of it.
12th May 2006 @ 22:37
Comment from: Paul Smith [Member] · http://www.dasmirnov.net/
Evidence is on that website, if you're too lazy to read - and therefore admit ignorance, would you just be quiet, or at least stop preaching things that are made up.
13th May 2006 @ 00:05
Comment from: Meleth [Visitor]
Not sure where I stand on the whole issue but when people put forward arguements basically saying "I'm too lazy to read or even spell properly so therefore evolution doesn't exist" it doesn't really say a lot and doesn't help their "cause" one bit.
13th May 2006 @ 03:05
Comment from: Big Bang Is A Myth [Visitor] · http://www.thedailycreationism.blogspot.com/
It is not because I can't read it is just that am doing a 1000 word synopsis on a book and am very busy doing a collage course I still believe in creation because you still haven't said one bit of evidence that supports the evolution theory.

If you think that there is evidence for evolution then stop saying that there is and start telling us what it is.
13th May 2006 @ 10:52
Comment from: Paul Smith [Member] · http://www.dasmirnov.net/
Common descent. How's that? All life on Earth being made out of the same stuff. How's that?
13th May 2006 @ 14:00
Comment from: Big Bang Is A Myth [Visitor] · http://www.thedailycreationism.blogspot.com/
That dosn't prove evolution or common decent!!!

That could just as well prove creation or common designer.

Come it is evidence for evolution that I want.
13th May 2006 @ 21:10
Comment from: Paul Smith [Member] · http://www.dasmirnov.net/
Why do some humans have tails, some whales have back legs? Common descent. Genes that should of been turned off accidentally got turned on and their ascendants shone through.

Why would a "designer" permit errors to happen; heck why even risk filling the genome up with other species? A whale has no use for back legs, that's why over millions of years they disappeared, why include that DNA?

Who is this "designer" you speak of? He's doing a pretty poor job.
13th May 2006 @ 21:15
Comment from: Big Bang Is A Myth [Visitor] · http://www.thedailycreationism.blogspot.com/
You said that humans have tails, but that simply is not true, they have tail bones.

Anyway lets talk about the whale bones first.

Those bones are anchor points that special muscles attach to and without those special bones and those special muscles the whales can not reproduce. Male and female have different bones in that part to support different muscles for different reasons.

They have nothing to do with walking on land they have to do with getting baby whales.
14th May 2006 @ 13:15
Comment from: Big Bang Is A Myth [Visitor] · http://www.thedailycreationism.blogspot.com/
Now about the tail bone of the human.

There are nine little muscles that attach to the tail bone, with out which you can not perform some valuable functions. I won't tell you what they all are but trust me you need those muscles.

If you believe that the tail bone is vestigial then by friend Hovind will pay to have yours removed. (Hovind is the one who is offering 1/4 million $ for any scientific evidence for evolution. Not including micro evolution(variations with in the same kind))
14th May 2006 @ 14:47
Comment from: Big Bang Is A Myth [Visitor] · http://www.thedailycreationism.blogspot.com/
It is evidence that we want not lies come on.

You havent presented me with one bit of evidence.
14th May 2006 @ 15:22
Comment from: Tony [Visitor]
:o This is funny

I never thought I'd see a Creationist asking an Evolutionist for his evidence
14th May 2006 @ 16:39
Comment from: KoB [Visitor]
Agreed with Tony. Seriously, that's just sad.
14th May 2006 @ 17:16
Comment from: Paul Smith [Member] · http://www.dasmirnov.net/
Lies? I've presented you with mountains of evidence, read the website. You're unable to explain it without resorting to dismissing it all.

Why would humans have tails? Why would whales have back legs? Don't misread what I said - some humans have tails..... Google for it, and whales with back legs.
14th May 2006 @ 20:39
Comment from: Big Bang Is A Myth [Visitor] · http://www.thedailycreationism.blogspot.com/
same arguments i said why the whales have leg bones, and why humans have tail bones.

And that Dr. Kent Hovind will pay to have yours removed.

I can't read the whole of that website looking for one bit of evidence.

So if you think that there is evidence then i would really like to know.
14th May 2006 @ 21:03
Comment from: Paul Smith [Member] · http://www.dasmirnov.net/
Read what I'm saying, not just "tale bones" but complete tails, with full circulatory systems. The whales found with back legs fully developed back legs.

Now if they didn't carry the old DNA (which they wouldn't if they were built) then the chances that a mutant tail or legs would appear in the corrent places with respect to other species would be far less.

But when there's an error in development you don't get tails coming from your hands or head, you get it from the right part of your body.
14th May 2006 @ 21:22
Comment from: Zelieo [Visitor]
Hey, Give me one speck of proof that your creationalist theories are true. If you can, i'll give you...

A whole cookie, not those crappy ones churches give out.
14th May 2006 @ 21:23
Comment from: Big Bang Is A Myth [Visitor] · http://www.thedailycreationism.blogspot.com/
Humans with complete tails?!!!!

I would like to hear about this

I think you have my e-mail address being as i typed it in just above where i am writing could you please send me some information about these tails on humans and fully developed legs on whales.

Thanks very much
14th May 2006 @ 21:30
Comment from: Zelieo [Visitor]
READ. Why is it that you people can't READ. He said Google it. Here, i'll help you:

http://www.visual-evolution.com/tails.htm
14th May 2006 @ 21:39

Leave a comment


Your email address will not be revealed on this site.

Your URL will be displayed.
PoorExcellent
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Name, email & website)