Why creationism is wrong and evolution is right

An excellent hour long lecture on evidence supporting evolution carried out by Professor Steve Jones.

Science is about disbelief. It accepts that all knowledge is provisional and that any theory might in principle be disproved. Some theories are better established than others: the earth is probably not flat, babies are almost certainly not brought by storks, and men and dinosaurs are unlikely to have appeared on earth within the past few thousand years. Even so, nothing is sacred in 1905 classical physics collapsed after a seemingly trivial observation about glowing gases and the same is potentially true for all other scientific theories.

Many biologists are worried by a recent and unexpected return of an argument based on belief by the certainty, untestable and unsupported by evidence, that life did not evolve but appeared by supernatural means. Worldwide, more people believe in creationism than in evolution. Why do no biologists agree? Steve Jones will talk about what evolution is, about new evidence that men and chimps are close relatives and about how we are, nevertheless, unique and why creationism does more harm to religion than it does to science.

12 comments

Comment from: Anonymous [Visitor]
I agree. Nothing against creationism, but I find it hard to believe that somewhere out there, a supernatural being is looking down on "his work". There has not been any good reasoning behind the creationism theory.
18th April 2006 @ 21:21
Comment from: W [Visitor]
There has been GREAT reasoning behind the creationism theory. Especially the young earth arguments which all stand independantly and completely disproves the evolution theory. Remember, there are many young earth arguments, if a single one of them is true, evolution is nothing...

Ofcourse creationism is about believing something, that's exactly what faith is right? :-)

7th May 2006 @ 20:21
Comment from: Big Bang Is A Myth [Visitor] · http://www.thedailycreationism.blogspot.com/
I think that you are completly wrong about creation and evolution there is no evidence for evolution at all you might want to have a look at my blog which is http://www.thedailycreationism.blogspot.com/

See you there by the way if you have a question just leave it as a comment on my blog and i will try and get you an answer.

bye
10th May 2006 @ 10:00
Comment from: Big Bang Is A Myth [Visitor] · http://www.thedailycreationism.blogspot.com/
I just realised that you have a lecture from professor Steve Jones wow i e-mail him regally what a coincidence. Any way as i was trying to say if you have a lecture on evolution then I would like every one too see my friends lecture on creation http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2932359112394939560&q=kent+hovind by the way he is offering a 1/4 of a million $ to anyone who can prove evolution scientifically.

I hope that you all enjoy your watch

bye
10th May 2006 @ 10:09
Comment from: Paul Smith [Member] · http://www.dasmirnov.net/
Ah typical Creationist, dismiss the mountains of evidence they disagree with.
10th May 2006 @ 15:34
Comment from: Big Bang Is A Myth [Visitor] · http://www.thedailycreationism.blogspot.com/
Hi Paul,

I am glad that you replyed. Did you watch that video that i linked you to?

Bye Bye
10th May 2006 @ 15:52
Comment from: Big Bang Is A Myth [Visitor] · http://www.thedailycreationism.blogspot.com/
You said that creationists dismiss the mountins of evidence that they disagree with. ok fine. What evidence?
10th May 2006 @ 15:55
Comment from: Paul Smith [Member] · http://www.dasmirnov.net/
You are very well aware of the evidence, I've got better things to do with my time then spend hours arguing with someone you cannot argue with.
10th May 2006 @ 16:00
Comment from: Big Bang Is A Myth [Visitor] · http://www.thedailycreationism.blogspot.com/
NO NO NO you are very awair of the evidence and that is why you don't want to talk about it.
10th May 2006 @ 16:03
Comment from: Big Bang Is A Myth [Visitor] · http://www.thedailycreationism.blogspot.com/
You see you know that there is no evidence supporting evolution so you are too scard to talk about it because you know that the evidence suports me.

Can't you just give me one bit of evidence for evolution and then i might believe you.

By the way if you have got scintific evidence for evolution then you could win 1/4 million $


Thank you bye


http://www.thedailycreationism.blogspot.com/
10th May 2006 @ 16:56
Comment from: Jonathan Bartlett [Visitor] · http://baraminology.blogspot.com/
For anyone interested in how science relates to Creationism, I have a blog on Creationism research news.

It is true that for most Creationists scriptural authority comes first. However, this is not as unscientific as it might appear.

Also, many people falsely believe that evolution is supported by the same scientific method that supports other sorts of sciences like physics. In fact, Ernst Mayr switched the rules of science to allow for evolution by proposing the "Historical Narrative" method of inquiry, which is now the standard of inquiry on which large-scale rests.
14th May 2006 @ 04:52
Comment from: Jonathan Bartlett [Visitor] · http://baraminology.blogspot.com/
Grrr... apparently it doesn't take "a" tags. Here are the URLs:

Creationism Research News:

http://baraminology.blogspot.com/

How scriptural authority meshes with science:

http://crevobits.blogspot.com/2006/02/history-creation-observables-and.html
14th May 2006 @ 04:53

Leave a comment


Your email address will not be revealed on this site.

Your URL will be displayed.
PoorExcellent
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Name, email & website)